Foundational Elements for Program Evaluation in the Steps to a HealthierUS Program
Author Information
Author(s): MacDonald Goldie, Garcia Danyael, Zaza Stephanie, Schooley Michael, Compton Don, Bryant Terry, Bagnol Lulu, Edgerly Cathy, Haverkate Rick
Primary Institution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Hypothesis
How can foundational elements improve program evaluation in public health initiatives?
Conclusion
The Steps Program emphasizes the importance of foundational elements in program evaluation to enhance public health outcomes.
Supporting Evidence
- The Steps Program funds communities to implement chronic disease prevention efforts.
- Public health practitioners often overlook overarching visions for program evaluation.
- Foundational elements guide program evaluation practice while allowing for site-specific needs.
Takeaway
This study shows how communities can work together to make health programs better by planning and checking how well they are doing.
Methodology
The study developed foundational elements for program evaluation planning and implementation based on community needs and existing frameworks.
Potential Biases
Potential bias may arise from varying stakeholder interests and the flexibility of recommendations.
Limitations
The study may not account for all community-specific contexts and needs in program evaluation.
Participant Demographics
The program includes diverse communities across urban, rural, and tribal areas.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website