Is There a Global Bioethics? End-of-Life in Thailand and the Case for Local Difference
2006

Global Bioethics and End-of-Life Decisions in Thailand

Sample size: 30 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Scott Stonington, Pinit Ratanakul

Primary Institution: University of California San Francisco

Hypothesis

What should the bioethics be for developing countries adopting allopathic medicine?

Conclusion

Thailand needs to develop its own bioethical systems using local concepts to address end-of-life decisions effectively.

Supporting Evidence

  • Western bioethics does not adequately address the ethical dilemmas faced in Thai medical practice.
  • Thai physicians often refuse to withdraw ventilators due to cultural and ethical beliefs.
  • The concept of karma plays a significant role in medical decision-making in Thailand.

Takeaway

This study shows that Thailand needs its own way of thinking about medical ethics, especially for tough decisions at the end of life.

Methodology

The study is based on 30 ethnographic interviews and two months of participant-observation fieldwork.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in interpreting local ethical frameworks through a Western lens.

Limitations

The study may not encompass all cultural perspectives within Thailand.

Participant Demographics

Participants included Thai physicians and families involved in end-of-life decisions.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030439

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication