Comparing Self-Report and Direct Measures of Physical Activity in Adults
Author Information
Author(s): Stéphanie A. Prince, Kristi B. Adamo, Meghan E. Hamel, Jill Hardt, Sarah Connor Gorber, Mark Tremblay
Primary Institution: University of Ottawa
Hypothesis
This study aims to determine the extent of agreement between self-reported and directly measured physical activity in adults.
Conclusion
The measurement method significantly impacts observed levels of physical activity, with self-reports often differing from direct measures.
Supporting Evidence
- Correlations between self-report and direct measures were generally low-to-moderate, ranging from -0.71 to 0.96.
- Self-report measures often overestimated physical activity levels compared to direct measures.
- 38% of studies had lower quality scores based on risk of bias assessments.
Takeaway
This study looked at how people report their physical activity compared to how it's measured directly, finding that self-reports can be quite different from actual measurements.
Methodology
The study systematically reviewed literature, analyzing 187 articles that compared self-reported and directly measured physical activity.
Potential Biases
One-third of the studies had lower quality based on their description of methods and validity.
Limitations
Many studies did not report actual probabilities or measures of variability, and the representativeness of samples was often not assessed.
Participant Demographics
Participants ranged from 10 to 101 years of age, with a focus on adults aged 18 and over.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website