National Electronic Health Record Models in the US and Australia
Author Information
Author(s): Gunter Tracy D MD, Terry Nicolas P LLM, Powell John
Primary Institution: Saint Louis University
Hypothesis
What are the challenges and differences in electronic health record models between the United States and Australia?
Conclusion
The study highlights the contrasting approaches to electronic health records in the US and Australia, focusing on patient autonomy and data management.
Supporting Evidence
- The US and Australian models of electronic health records differ in their architecture and approach to patient privacy.
- HealthConnect in Australia allows patients to control which elements of their health records are shared.
- The US model is criticized for its slow adoption of technology in hospitals.
Takeaway
This article talks about how different countries are trying to keep track of people's health records electronically and the problems they face.
Potential Biases
Potential bias in favor of electronic health records due to the authors' affiliations with health law studies.
Limitations
The article does not provide empirical data or specific case studies to support its claims.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website