Are the Results of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (Third Edition) Predictive for Later Motor Skills and School Performance?
2024

Predicting Future Motor Skills and School Performance with Bayley Scales

Sample size: 170 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Kipping Sophia Maria, Kiess Wieland, Ludwig Juliane, Meigen Christof, Poulain Tanja, Chiappedi Matteo Alessio

Primary Institution: LIFE Leipzig Research Center for Civilization Diseases, Leipzig University

Hypothesis

The results of the Bayley-III in healthy one-year-old children are predictive for their later motor skills and school performance.

Conclusion

The cognitive scale of the Bayley-III may be used as a predictive tool for later motor skills, but it cannot predict school performance.

Supporting Evidence

  • Below-average performance in the cognitive part of the Bayley-III was significantly associated with poorer performance in various motor skills.
  • The study found no significant associations between Bayley-III performance and school grades.
  • Associations were not moderated by age, sex, or socioeconomic status.

Takeaway

This study looked at whether a test for babies can help predict how well they will do in school and with physical skills later on. It found that while the test can help predict physical skills, it doesn't help with school grades.

Methodology

The study used a prospective, longitudinal design with healthy children who completed the Bayley-III at 1 year and were assessed for motor skills and school grades at later ages.

Potential Biases

The cohort exhibited a trend towards a higher socioeconomic status, which may introduce bias.

Limitations

The study had a small sample size and a non-representative cohort, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

Sample 1 included 170 participants (55% male, mean age at t1 = 1.0 years), and Sample 2 included 69 participants (59% male, mean age at t1 = 1.0 years).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.045

Confidence Interval

95% CI (−0.9; −0.01)

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/children11121486

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication