Forest Restoration in a Fog Oasis: Evidence Indicates Need for Cultural Awareness in Constructing the Reference Ecological References for Fog Oasis Restoration
2011

Restoration of Fog Oasis Ecosystems in Peru

Sample size: 8 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Balaguer Luís, Arroyo-García Rosa, Jiménez Percy, Jiménez María Dolores, Villegas Luís, Cordero Irene, Rubio de Casas Rafael, Fernández-Delgado Raúl, Ron María Eugenia, Manrique Esteban, Vargas Pablo, Cano Emilio, Pueyo José J., Aronson James

Primary Institution: Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Hypothesis

If anthropogenic influence were negligible, the Atiquipa population of tara would have undergone genetic divergence from other Peruvian populations.

Conclusion

The presence and dominance of tara in the Atiquipa fog oasis is likely due to past human activity.

Supporting Evidence

  • The genetic diversity of tara showed no clear geographical structuring.
  • Seedlings in the forest did not perform better than those in deforested areas.
  • Historical evidence suggests that the Inca practiced agroforestry in the region.
  • Low genetic differentiation among populations indicates possible human influence.
  • Restoration efforts should incorporate sustainable practices reflecting ancient uses.

Takeaway

This study shows that the unique forests in Peru's fog oases were likely shaped by ancient human practices, and restoring them should consider these historical influences.

Methodology

Genetic diversity of tara was studied across various populations, and seedling performance was compared between forest and deforested areas.

Potential Biases

Potential bias may arise from the limited geographical scope of the sampled populations.

Limitations

The study's findings may be limited by the small sample size and the specific environmental conditions of the study site.

Participant Demographics

The study involved populations from various regions in Peru, Colombia, and Bolivia.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0023004

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication