Exploring students' perceptions on the use of significant event analysis, as part of a portfolio assessment process in general practice, as a tool for learning how to use reflection in learning
2007

Exploring Students' Perceptions of Reflective Learning in General Practice

Sample size: 81 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Grant Andrew J, Vermunt Jan D, Kinnersley Paul, Houston Helen

Primary Institution: Cardiff University

Hypothesis

Can significant event analysis in portfolio assessments enhance reflective learning among medical students?

Conclusion

The study found that while students thought more about their patients, the overall benefits of reflective learning were limited.

Supporting Evidence

  • Students rated their mentoring relationship with their GP teacher highly.
  • Moderate inter-rater reliability was found among markers.
  • Students found the portfolio tasks time-consuming.

Takeaway

Students used a special tool to think about their learning, but it didn't help them as much as they hoped.

Methodology

81 final-year medical students completed reflective significant event analyses as part of a portfolio during a three-week attachment in general practice.

Potential Biases

Differences in preparation among raters may have influenced inter-rater reliability.

Limitations

The short time frame limited students' ability to adapt to reflective learning, potentially affecting their experience.

Participant Demographics

Final-year medical students from Imperial College Medical School.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6920-7-5

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication