Review of Empathy Tests in Medicine
Author Information
Author(s): Joanne M Hemmerdinger, Samuel D R Stoddart, Richard J Lilford
Primary Institution: Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Birmingham
Hypothesis
The review aims to determine the reliability and validity of existing tests for the assessment of medical empathy.
Conclusion
While several empathy measures have been psychometrically assessed, none are sufficiently valid for use in selecting medical students.
Supporting Evidence
- 50 relevant papers describing 36 different instruments of empathy measurement were identified.
- Eight instruments demonstrated evidence of reliability, internal consistency, and validity.
- None of the empathy measures were found to have sufficient predictive validity for selection into medical school.
Takeaway
This study looked at tests that measure empathy in doctors and medical students, but found that none of them are good enough to help choose who gets into medical school.
Methodology
A systematic review of research papers relating to the reliability and validity of tests of empathy in medical students and doctors.
Potential Biases
Potential for biased responding on personality tests, especially in high-stakes selection contexts.
Limitations
The review was limited to English-language publications and may have missed important literature.
Participant Demographics
Included medical school applicants, medical students, and practicing clinicians.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website