Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes for Cancer Patients
Author Information
Author(s): Yamaguchi Ken, Higashiyama Nozomi, Umemiya Maki, Inayama Yoshihide, Koike Ayami, Ueda Akihiko, Mizuno Rin, Taki Mana, Yamanoi Koji, Murakami Ryusuke, Hamanishi Junzo, Mandai Masaki
Primary Institution: Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, Kyoto University
Hypothesis
Can electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) improve communication and quality of life for cancer patients?
Conclusion
ePROs enhance patient-provider communication, education, and self-management, potentially improving treatment outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Supporting Evidence
- ePROs have been shown to improve communication between patients and healthcare providers.
- Patients using ePROs reported better self-management and health outcomes.
- Digital health technologies can reduce healthcare disparities by extending services beyond clinical settings.
- Challenges such as adherence and economic constraints need to be addressed for effective implementation.
Takeaway
This study shows that using digital tools to let cancer patients report their symptoms can help doctors understand their needs better and improve their care.
Methodology
The review discusses the advantages and challenges of ePROs in cancer care, supported by various studies and trials.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the reliance on self-reported data and varying levels of digital literacy among patients.
Limitations
Challenges include adherence issues, increased workload for healthcare providers, and economic constraints.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website