Cost-Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Intervention for Low Back Pain
Author Information
Author(s): Berenguera Anna, Pujol-Ribera Enriqueta, Rodriguez-Blanco Teresa, Violan Concepció, Casajuana Marc, de Kort Nelleke, Trapero-Bertran Marta
Primary Institution: Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol)
Hypothesis
The study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of a multidisciplinary biopsychosocial educational group intervention for non-specific sub-acute low back pain compared to usual care.
Conclusion
The study hopes to demonstrate that the multidisciplinary intervention is cost-effective and improves patients' quality of life while reducing social costs.
Supporting Evidence
- Low back pain is a common reason for health consultations and leads to significant costs.
- The study includes a large sample size of 932 patients.
- The intervention is designed to be applicable in primary care settings.
Takeaway
This study is looking at whether a special group program can help people with back pain feel better and save money for healthcare.
Methodology
A cluster randomised controlled trial comparing a multidisciplinary intervention with usual care in 38 primary health care centres.
Potential Biases
The study may be affected by biases due to non-response and incomplete follow-up.
Limitations
Potential variability in usual care among participating GPs and nurses, and possible loss to follow-up.
Participant Demographics
Patients aged 18 to 65 with non-specific sub-acute low back pain.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website