Enforcement of State Indoor Tanning Laws in the US
Author Information
Author(s): Mayer Joni A, Hoerster Katherine D, Pichon Latrice C, Rubio Debra A, Woodruff Susan I, Forster Jean L
Primary Institution: San Diego State University
Hypothesis
Whether state laws regulating indoor tanning facilities are effectively enforced across the 28 states that have such legislation.
Conclusion
The study found low rates of annual inspections and citations for indoor tanning facilities, indicating a need for improved enforcement practices.
Supporting Evidence
- Licensure for indoor tanning businesses was required in 22 of the 28 cities.
- Approximately 32% of the cities did not inspect indoor tanning facilities for compliance with state law.
- Most cities that conducted inspections did so unannounced.
Takeaway
This study looked at how well states enforce laws about indoor tanning, and it found that many places don't check if tanning businesses are following the rules.
Methodology
Interviews were conducted with key informants in the most populous city of each of the 28 states to assess enforcement practices regarding indoor tanning laws.
Potential Biases
Respondents may have overreported enforcement practices due to the assurance of anonymity.
Limitations
Data were based on self-reports from enforcement professionals, which may lead to overreporting of enforcement practices.
Participant Demographics
Key informants from state or local health agencies knowledgeable about enforcement practices.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.006
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website