Factors Associated with Retention in Quitline Counseling for Smoking Cessation among HIV-Positive Smokers Receiving Care at HIV Outpatient Clinics in Vietnam
2024

Factors Affecting Retention in Quitline Counseling for HIV-Positive Smokers in Vietnam

Sample size: 221 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Nguyen Nam Truong, Nguyen Trang, Vu Giap Van, Cleland Charles M., Pham Yen, Truong Nga, Kapur Reet, Alvarez Gloria Guevara, Phan Phuong Thu, Armstrong-Hough Mari, Shelley Donna

Primary Institution: Institute of Social and Medical Studies, Ha Noi, Vietnam

Hypothesis

What factors are associated with retention in Quitline counseling for smoking cessation among HIV-positive smokers receiving care at outpatient clinics in Vietnam?

Conclusion

There is a high retention rate in Quitline counseling services among HIV-positive individuals receiving care at outpatient clinics.

Supporting Evidence

  • 51% of HIV-positive smokers completed more than five counseling sessions.
  • Older smokers (over 35) were more likely to retain in counseling.
  • Lower tobacco dependence levels were associated with higher retention rates.
  • Household smoking bans positively influenced retention in counseling.

Takeaway

This study found that older HIV-positive smokers who have lower tobacco dependence and set a quit date are more likely to stick with Quitline counseling to quit smoking.

Methodology

The study analyzed data from a randomized controlled trial comparing three smoking cessation interventions at 13 outpatient clinics in Hanoi, Vietnam.

Potential Biases

The reliance on self-reported data may introduce bias due to social desirability or recall inaccuracies.

Limitations

The sample was predominantly male and older, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

Most participants were males (95.9%) and over the age of 35 (92.3%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.004

Confidence Interval

95% CI 1.42–21.52

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0316250

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication