Regulating the market in human research participants
2006
Regulating the Market in Human Research Participants
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): Trudo Lemmens, Paul B. Miller
Primary Institution: University of Toronto
Hypothesis
The article aims to examine the ethical implications of recruitment incentives in clinical trials.
Conclusion
The practice of paying research participants and physicians for recruitment is inadequately regulated and raises significant ethical concerns.
Supporting Evidence
- Recruitment incentives can interfere with physicians' judgment and patient safety.
- Patients may be treated as commodities in clinical trials due to financial incentives.
- Regulatory frameworks for recruitment incentives are often inadequate.
Takeaway
This study looks at how paying doctors to recruit patients for clinical trials can be risky and might not be safe for patients.
Potential Biases
Potential conflicts of interest may arise from financial incentives affecting physician judgment.
Limitations
The article does not provide empirical data to support its claims.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website