Regulating the market in human research participants
2006

Regulating the Market in Human Research Participants

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Trudo Lemmens, Paul B. Miller

Primary Institution: University of Toronto

Hypothesis

The article aims to examine the ethical implications of recruitment incentives in clinical trials.

Conclusion

The practice of paying research participants and physicians for recruitment is inadequately regulated and raises significant ethical concerns.

Supporting Evidence

  • Recruitment incentives can interfere with physicians' judgment and patient safety.
  • Patients may be treated as commodities in clinical trials due to financial incentives.
  • Regulatory frameworks for recruitment incentives are often inadequate.

Takeaway

This study looks at how paying doctors to recruit patients for clinical trials can be risky and might not be safe for patients.

Potential Biases

Potential conflicts of interest may arise from financial incentives affecting physician judgment.

Limitations

The article does not provide empirical data to support its claims.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pmed.0030330

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication