Using Remote Sensing to Find Malaria Risk Factors
Author Information
Author(s): Moss William J, Hamapumbu Harry, Kobayashi Tamaki, Shields Timothy, Kamanga Aniset, Clennon Julie, Mharakurwa Sungano, Thuma Philip E, Glass Gregory
Primary Institution: Johns Hopkins University
Hypothesis
Can remote sensing technologies identify environmental risk factors for malaria transmission in a region of declining burden?
Conclusion
Remote sensing technologies can effectively target malaria control interventions in areas with decreasing malaria transmission.
Supporting Evidence
- 768 individuals from 128 households were enrolled over 21 months.
- 15.2% of individuals tested positive for malaria.
- Households within 3.75 km of a third order stream had increased malaria risk.
- Higher elevations were associated with decreased risk of malaria.
- Targeting the top 80th percentile of malaria risk would require interventions for only 24% of households.
Takeaway
Scientists used satellite images to find out where malaria is more likely to happen, so they can help people in those areas better.
Methodology
Households were randomly selected using satellite images for longitudinal and cross-sectional surveys of malaria parasitaemia.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from the selection of households based on satellite imagery.
Limitations
The study may not account for all environmental factors influencing malaria transmission.
Participant Demographics
Median age of participants was 12.8 years, with a range of ages included.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.0001
Confidence Interval
95% CI 1.1-6.2
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website