Predicting Protein Disorder from Sequences
Author Information
Author(s): Kumar Suresh, Carugo Oliviero
Primary Institution: Max F. Perutz Laboratories, Vienna University
Hypothesis
Can we accurately predict disordered residues in proteins based on their amino acid sequences?
Conclusion
The new consensus method for predicting protein conformational disorder outperforms individual prediction algorithms.
Supporting Evidence
- The consensus method showed better performance than any individual predictor.
- 22% of analyzed crystal structures had more than 5% disordered residues.
- The probability excess of the consensus method was 80.1%, indicating high prediction reliability.
Takeaway
This study helps scientists figure out which proteins are too messy to study by looking at their building blocks. It shows that some proteins can be a little messy and still work.
Methodology
The study used a consensus method that combines results from twelve different prediction algorithms to identify disordered residues in proteins.
Potential Biases
The prediction reliability may be biased due to the unbalanced nature of ordered and disordered residues in the dataset.
Limitations
The reliability indicators are based on a specific set of proteins from the DISPROT database, which may not generalize to other datasets.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website