Improving Research Evidence Use in Health Guidelines
Author Information
Author(s): Andrew D Oxman, Holger J Schünemann, Atle Fretheim
Primary Institution: Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
Hypothesis
What criteria and processes should be used to establish priorities for health care guidelines?
Conclusion
The study suggests that explicit criteria and systematic processes are essential for open and defensible priority setting in health care guidelines.
Supporting Evidence
- WHO needs to prioritize health topics based on the burden of illness and the feasibility of developing recommendations.
- The process of setting priorities should involve consultation with stakeholders and be documented for transparency.
- Both centralized and decentralized processes should be used to address different health needs.
Takeaway
This study helps figure out how to choose what health topics to focus on by using clear rules and processes.
Methodology
The authors reviewed existing literature and systematic reviews on priority setting for health care guidelines without conducting their own systematic reviews.
Potential Biases
There is a risk of bias due to the lack of empirical data to support the proposed criteria.
Limitations
The study does not provide empirical evidence for the proposed criteria and processes.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website