An Investigation to Validate the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) Test to Identify Children with Specific Language Impairment
2011

Validating the GAPS Test for Identifying Language Impairment in Children

Sample size: 51 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): van der Lely Heather K. J., Payne Elisabeth, McClelland Alastair, Pinker Steven

Primary Institution: Laboratoire de Neuropsychologie Interventionnelle, École Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Hypothesis

Can the Grammar and Phonology Screening (GAPS) test accurately identify children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI)?

Conclusion

The GAPS test is highly accurate in identifying children with grammatical and phonological impairments.

Supporting Evidence

  • The GAPS test showed high sensitivity and specificity in identifying children with SLI.
  • 100% of children in the Young SLI group performed below the expected level for their age.
  • Significant correlations were found between GAPS scores and other standardized language assessments.
  • The GAPS test can be administered by both professionals and non-professionals.
  • Results indicate that the GAPS test is a realistic tool for early identification of language impairments.

Takeaway

The GAPS test is a quick way to check if kids have trouble with grammar and sounds in their speech, helping to find those who need extra help.

Methodology

The study involved testing three groups of children using the GAPS test and other language assessments to evaluate their language abilities.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the non-blind testing by the experimenter.

Limitations

The study's sample may not represent the general population, and the experimenter was not blind to the participants' status.

Participant Demographics

Participants included typically developing children and children diagnosed with SLI, aged between 3 years 4 months and 8 years 11 months.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.01

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0022432

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication