Serotype Distribution and Invasive Potential of Group B Streptococcus Isolates Causing Disease in Infants and Colonizing Maternal-Newborn Dyads
2011

Study of Group B Streptococcus in Mothers and Newborns

Sample size: 2561 publication 10 minutes Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): Madzivhandila Mashudu, Adrian Peter V., Cutland Clare L., Kuwanda Locadiah, Schrag Stephanie J., Madhi Shabir A.

Primary Institution: University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

Hypothesis

Understanding the serotype epidemiology of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is necessary to determine the potential coverage of serotype-specific GBS vaccines.

Conclusion

An anti-GBS vaccine including serotypes Ia, Ib, and III could potentially prevent a significant percentage of GBS associated with maternal vaginal colonization and invasive disease in neonates.

Supporting Evidence

  • GBS was identified in 52.4% of newborns born to mothers with GBS vaginal colonization.
  • Serotype III was the most common invasive serotype in newborns less than 7 days old.
  • The study found a high concordance of serotypes between colonized mothers and their newborns.

Takeaway

This study looked at how a type of bacteria called Group B Streptococcus affects babies and their mothers, and found that a vaccine could help protect them.

Methodology

The study involved identifying GBS isolates from mothers and newborns through vaginal swabbing and laboratory surveillance, followed by serotyping.

Potential Biases

Potential bias in identifying maternal colonization and the possibility of GBS acquisition from non-maternal sources.

Limitations

The study may have underestimated GBS colonization due to the exclusion of rectal swabs and the timing of swabbing during labor.

Participant Demographics

The study involved mothers and newborns from an urban population in Soweto, South Africa.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95%CI 0.31–0.77

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0017861

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication