Psychological Distress and Social Adjustment of a Working Adult Population with Single-Sided Deafness
2024

Psychological Distress and Social Adjustment in Adults with Single-Sided Deafness

Sample size: 149 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Apa Enrico, Nocini Riccardo, Ciorba Andrea, Sacchetto Luca, Gherpelli Chiara, Monzani Daniele, Palma Silvia, Lopez-Escamez Jose A.

Primary Institution: Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda, Policlinico of Milan, Italy

Hypothesis

This study aims to explore the psycho-social profile of adult workers affected by single-sided deafness (SSD) compared to subjects with normal hearing.

Conclusion

The study found that adults with SSD have significantly worse psychological health and social functioning compared to those with normal hearing.

Supporting Evidence

  • Subjects with SSD reported higher levels of psychological distress and lower social functioning compared to normal hearing subjects.
  • The study used validated psychometric tests to assess the impact of SSD on well-being.
  • Significant differences were found in emotional and social-situational scores between the SSD and normal hearing groups.
  • Participants with SSD experienced difficulties in daily activities and social participation.
  • Employers with hearing loss reported higher stress levels and worse health states.

Takeaway

People who can only hear from one ear often feel sad and have a hard time making friends, especially at work.

Methodology

This is a cross-sectional, case-control study involving psychometric tests administered to subjects aged 24-65 with SSD and a control group with normal hearing.

Potential Biases

Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to reduce bias, but the small sample size may still introduce confounding factors.

Limitations

The study's limitations include a lack of psychiatric evaluation and a small sample size for multifactorial analyses.

Participant Demographics

149 subjects aged 24-65 years, with 68 males (45.6%) and 81 females (54.4%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/audiolres14060091

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication