Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases
2010

Receptor Conversion in Distant Breast Cancer Metastases

Sample size: 233 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Laurien DC Hoefnagel, Marc J van de Vijver, Henk-Jan van Slooten, Pieter Wesseling, Jelle Wesseling, Pieter J Westenend, Joost Bart, Cornelis A Seldenrijk, Iris D Nagtegaal, Joost Oudejans, Paul van der Valk, Petra van der Groep, Elisabeth GE de Vries, Elsken van der Wall, Paul J van Diest

Primary Institution: University Medical Center Utrecht

Hypothesis

The study aimed to investigate receptor conversion for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 in distant breast cancer metastases.

Conclusion

Receptor conversion in distant breast cancer metastases occurs, is relatively uncommon for ERα and HER2, and is more frequent for PR, especially in liver and brain metastases.

Supporting Evidence

  • Receptor conversion by IHC for ERα occurred in 10.3% of patients.
  • PR conversion occurred in 30.0% of patients.
  • HER2 conversion occurred in 5.2% of patients.
  • Conversion was mainly from positive in the primary tumor to negative in the metastases for ERα and PR.
  • PR conversion occurred significantly more often in liver, brain, and gastro-intestinal metastases.

Takeaway

Sometimes, the type of breast cancer can change when it spreads to other parts of the body, which can affect how doctors decide to treat it.

Methodology

233 distant breast cancer metastases were IHC stained for ERα, PR, and HER2, and expression was compared to that of the primary tumor.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the retrospective nature of the study and reliance on previously established diagnoses.

Limitations

Previous studies had small sample sizes and methodological issues, and this study did not include bone metastases to avoid false negatives.

Participant Demographics

Female patients with invasive breast cancer, mean age 53.9 years, with various tumor sizes and histologic types.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/bcr2645

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication