How Industry Uses the ICMJE Guidelines to Manipulate Authorship--And How They Should Be Revised
2011
Legal Remedies for Medical Ghostwriting
publication
Evidence: moderate
Author Information
Author(s): Stern Simon, Lemmens Trudo
Primary Institution: University of Toronto
Hypothesis
Can imposing legal liability on guest authors deter the practice of ghostwriting in medical publications?
Conclusion
Imposing legal liability on guest authors could effectively deter ghostwriting practices in medical literature.
Supporting Evidence
- Ghostwriting raises ethical and legal concerns about the integrity of medical research.
- Guest authorship can mislead readers and distort perceptions of research credibility.
- Legal liability could deter the practice of ghostwriting and protect the integrity of medical literature.
Takeaway
Some people write medical articles but let others take credit for them, which is unfair. Making those who take credit legally responsible could help stop this.
Potential Biases
Potential bias exists in the reporting of clinical trials due to industry influence.
Limitations
The effectiveness of legal sanctions on deterring ghostwriting is uncertain and may not be widely enforced.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website