Engaging Partners in Evaluation Efforts
Author Information
Author(s): Sundra Wright Demia, Anderson Lynda A, Brownson Ross C, Gwaltney Margaret K, Scherer Jennifer, Cross Alan W, Goodman Robert M, Schwartz Randy, Sims Tom, White Carol R
Primary Institution: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Hypothesis
How can a participatory approach improve the evaluation planning process for the Prevention Research Centers Program?
Conclusion
Using participatory methods led to increased stakeholder engagement and the development of a national logic model for program evaluation.
Supporting Evidence
- Participatory methods resulted in increased buy-in from stakeholders.
- The national logic model was used for program planning and evaluation.
- Stakeholders reported feeling more involved in the evaluation process.
- Challenges included the time and resources required for the participatory approach.
Takeaway
This study shows that when everyone works together and shares their ideas, it helps make better plans for health programs.
Methodology
The study used a participatory evaluation approach involving stakeholders to develop a national logic model.
Potential Biases
Potential bias from stakeholder engagement if not all voices are equally represented.
Limitations
The process required significant time and resources, which may not be feasible for all programs.
Participant Demographics
Participants included PRC directors, staff, state health departments, community members, and national partner organizations.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website