Individualized Care in Nursing Homes Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic
2024

Individualized Care in Nursing Homes Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Sample size: 177 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Aurora García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Irene García-Camacha Gutiérrez, Riitta Suhonen, Beatriz Rodríguez-Martín, Richard Gray

Primary Institution: Social and Health Research Center, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain

Hypothesis

The study aims to analyze the changes in perceptions about the individualization of care, quality of life, and care environment of elderly people living in long-term care centers before and after the pandemic.

Conclusion

Slight improvements in individualized care were observed after the pandemic, but significant room for improvement remains.

Supporting Evidence

  • 177 elderly individuals participated in the study, with 87 pre-COVID-19 and 90 post-COVID-19.
  • 62.7% of participants were women, and the average age was 83.3 years.
  • Residents scored an average of 6.47 points out of 10 in life quality self-evaluation.
  • 10 out of 17 items related to maintaining individuality were rated higher after COVID-19.

Takeaway

This study looked at how elderly people in nursing homes felt about their care before and after COVID-19, finding some improvements but still a lot of room to make things better.

Methodology

A prospective cross-sectional observational study was conducted using validated scales to assess perceptions of individualized care, quality of life, and care environment.

Potential Biases

The sample had a clear female predominance, reflecting the feminization of old age, which may introduce bias in the findings.

Limitations

The study could not access private long-term care centers and only included fully competent participants, which may affect the generalizability of the findings.

Participant Demographics

The average age of participants was 83.3 years, with 62.7% being women and a majority reporting no formal education.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.058

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3390/nursrep14040283

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication