Disagreement on Coding Genes in Human Reference Sets
Author Information
Author(s): Maquedano Miguel, Cerdán-Vélez Daniel, Tress Michael L.
Primary Institution: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Hypothesis
Are the current human reference gene sets accurately classifying coding genes?
Conclusion
The study found that the three main gene repositories still disagree on the coding status of over 2,600 genes, indicating ongoing uncertainty in gene annotation.
Supporting Evidence
- The analysis revealed that the three reference sets still disagree on the status of 2,606 annotated genes.
- More than 700 genes have been merged or reclassified since the last analysis.
- 0.6% of Ensembl/GENCODE coding genes are not also annotated by the other two reference sets.
- Over 2,000 of the 21,873 coding genes examined had potential non-coding features.
Takeaway
Scientists looked at a lot of genes to see if they are really coding for proteins, and they found that many might not be, which means we might have too many genes labeled as coding.
Methodology
The study analyzed three main repositories for the human proteome and compared the coding status of genes using eight features indicative of non-coding genes.
Limitations
The analysis may not account for all factors influencing gene classification.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website