Comparison of assays used for in vitro chemosensitivity testing of human tumours
1984
Critique of Chemosensitivity Testing Methods
Commentary
Author Information
Author(s): S.E. Salmon, F.L. Meyskens, D.S. Alberts
Primary Institution: Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine
Conclusion
The conclusions drawn from cell line studies cannot be applied to fresh human tumors due to the lack of appropriate starting materials.
Supporting Evidence
- The authors argue that the comparison of assays is only valid for purified clonogenic populations, which are not available.
- They emphasize the need for prospective trials to validate chemosensitivity assays.
- The commentary suggests that confounding variables can affect assay results.
Takeaway
The study suggests that tests done on lab-grown cancer cells may not work the same way on actual tumors in people.
Potential Biases
The authors may have selectively reported studies that support their conclusions.
Limitations
The study's conclusions are based on cell lines, which may not represent fresh human tumors accurately.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website