Expanding perspectives and understanding relational potential: Are mutually beneficial human-animal relationships compatible with current animal agricultural practices?
2024

Understanding Human-Animal Relationships in Agriculture

publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Ryan Erin B, Weary Daniel M, Zobel Gosia M, Webster Jim, Higgins E Tory, Franks Becca

Primary Institution: University of British Columbia

Hypothesis

Are mutually beneficial human-animal relationships compatible with current animal agricultural practices?

Conclusion

The study suggests that expanding the understanding of human-animal relationships can improve animal welfare in agricultural settings.

Supporting Evidence

  • Animal agriculture employs approximately one-eighth of the world’s human population.
  • Over 160 billion animals are slaughtered annually for food.
  • Mutually beneficial relationships between humans and animals are often impeded in current farming systems.

Takeaway

This study looks at how humans and farm animals can have better relationships, which can help both the animals and the people who care for them.

Methodology

The study is a narrative review that examines various academic perspectives on human-animal relationships.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the focus on specific academic perspectives and the exclusion of alternative views.

Limitations

The review may not cover all perspectives on human-animal relationships and is limited to existing literature.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1017/awf.2024.62

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication