Prognostic Factors in Small Cell Lung Cancer
Author Information
Author(s): L.G.M. J0rgensen, K. Osterlind, H.H. Hansen, E.H. Cooper
Primary Institution: The Finsen Institute, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Hypothesis
What is the prognostic significance of serum neuron specific enolase and other tumor markers in small cell lung cancer?
Conclusion
High levels of neuron specific enolase and poor performance status are important for predicting prognosis in small cell lung cancer.
Supporting Evidence
- NSE and performance status were identified as the most significant prognostic factors.
- Patients with poor performance status had significantly lower survival rates.
- LDH was found to have a strong correlation with NSE levels.
Takeaway
Doctors can tell how well someone might do with small cell lung cancer by looking at certain blood tests and how the person feels.
Methodology
The study used multivariate analysis to assess the prognostic significance of tumor markers and other factors in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Limitations
The study had a small sample size and was limited to patients at a single institution.
Participant Demographics
The study included 86 patients with histologically proven small cell lung cancer, with a mix of performance statuses and disease stages.
Statistical Information
P-Value
<0.001
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website