Healthy Weigh Program Evaluation
Author Information
Author(s): Frable Pamela Jean, Dart Lyn, Bradley Patricia J
Primary Institution: Texas Christian University
Hypothesis
How can the evaluation process of the Healthy Weigh program be improved?
Conclusion
The evaluation process of the Healthy Weigh program successfully assessed its effects and highlighted areas for improvement.
Supporting Evidence
- Healthy Weigh Phase 1 was a community-based obesity prevention program.
- Participants reported improvements in nutrition and exercise knowledge scores.
- Seventy percent of participants reported dietary improvements.
Takeaway
The Healthy Weigh program helped families learn about healthy eating and exercise, and we found ways to make the program even better for the future.
Methodology
The evaluation used a logic model and formative evaluation data to identify questions that could improve the evaluation process.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the lack of formal agreements among key parties involved in the evaluation.
Limitations
The evaluation process lacked consistent qualitative data collection and did not fully engage community stakeholders in the evaluation design.
Participant Demographics
Predominantly low-income, Hispanic (82%) and African American (12%) families, with 72% female participants.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.05
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website