Treatment of alcohol dependence in patients with co-morbid major depressive disorder – predictors for the outcomes with memantine and escitalopram medication
2008

Comparing Memantine and Escitalopram for Alcohol Dependence with Depression

Sample size: 80 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Leea H Muhonen, Jari Lahti, David Sinclair, Jouko Lönnqvist, Hannu Alho

Primary Institution: National Public Health Institute, Department of Mental Health and Alcohol Research, Finland

Hypothesis

Can memantine reduce alcohol consumption and craving in patients with alcohol dependence and major depressive disorder more effectively than escitalopram?

Conclusion

Both memantine and escitalopram are effective in treating alcohol dependence co-morbid with major depression, with memantine showing comparable effectiveness to escitalopram.

Supporting Evidence

  • Both medications significantly reduced alcohol consumption as measured by the AUDIT scores.
  • Patients treated with memantine reported a decrease in alcohol craving similar to those treated with escitalopram.
  • Early age at first alcohol intoxication predicted poor treatment outcomes in patients treated with escitalopram.

Takeaway

This study looked at two medicines to help people who drink too much and feel sad. Both medicines helped, but memantine worked just as well as the other one.

Methodology

Eighty alcohol-dependent patients were randomized to receive either memantine or escitalopram for 26 weeks, with weekly visits to monitor alcohol use and craving.

Potential Biases

Potential bias due to the absence of a placebo control and the reliance on self-reported measures.

Limitations

The study lacked a placebo group and had a small sample size, which may limit the generalizability of the results.

Participant Demographics

All participants were Caucasian, aged 26 to 65, with 55% being men.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.0001

Confidence Interval

95% CI = -0.53 to -0.09

Statistical Significance

p<0.0001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1747-597X-3-20

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication