Sun protection and sunbathing practices among at-risk family members of patients with melanoma
2011

Sun Protection and Sunbathing Practices in Families at Risk for Melanoma

Sample size: 545 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Sharon L Manne, Elliot J Coups, Paul B Jacobsen, Michael Ming, Carolyn J Heckman, Stuart Lessin

Primary Institution: The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Hypothesis

Greater perceived sun protection benefits, sunscreen self-efficacy, photo-aging concerns, physician recommendation for sun protection, and sun protection norms would be associated with higher sun protection.

Conclusion

Interventions for family members at risk for melanoma might benefit from improving sun protection self-efficacy, reducing perceived sunbathing benefits, and targeting normative influences to sunbathe.

Supporting Evidence

  • Higher education levels were associated with better sun protection behaviors.
  • Younger individuals and females reported more sunbathing.
  • Greater sunscreen self-efficacy was linked to higher sun protection behaviors.
  • Participants with fewer perceived benefits of sunbathing engaged in better sun protection.

Takeaway

This study looked at how family members of melanoma patients protect themselves from the sun. It found that education and self-confidence in using sunscreen help people protect their skin better.

Methodology

Participants completed a phone survey to evaluate correlates of sun protection and sunbathing.

Potential Biases

The sample was predominantly well-educated and married, which may not reflect the general population.

Limitations

The cross-sectional design limits causal inferences, and the sample may not represent all demographics due to its composition.

Participant Demographics

Participants were primarily female (62.4%), with an average age of 46.3 years, and mostly white (99.1%).

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-122

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication