Changes in Tropical Tree Communities
Author Information
Author(s): Jérôme Chave, Richard Condit, Helene C. Muller-Landau, Sean C. Thomas, Peter S. Ashton, Sarayudh Bunyavejchewin, Co Leonardo L., Dattaraja Handanakere S., Stuart J. Davies, Shameema Esufali, Corneille E. N. Ewango, Kenneth J. Feeley, Robin B. Foster, Nimal Gunatilleke, Savitri Gunatilleke, Pamela Hall, Terese B. Hart, Consuelo Hernández, Stephen P. Hubbell, Akira Itoh, Somboon Kiratiprayoon, James V. LaFrankie, Suzanne Loo de Lao, Jean-Rémy Makana, Md. Nur Supardi Noor, Abdul Rahman Kassim, Cristián Samper, Raman Sukumar, Suresh Hebbalalu S., Sylvester Tan, Jill Thompson, Ma. Dolores C. Tongco, Renato Valencia, Martha Vallejo, Gorky Villa, Takuo Yamakura, Jess K. Zimmerman, Elizabeth C. Losos
Primary Institution: Laboratoire Evolution et Diversité Biologique CNRS/Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
Hypothesis
Are fast-growing species consistently increasing in dominance in tropical tree communities due to global environmental changes?
Conclusion
The study found that while aboveground biomass increased significantly in some tropical forests, fast-growing species did not consistently dominate, and slow-growing species gained biomass in many plots.
Supporting Evidence
- Aboveground biomass increased at seven of the ten plots studied.
- Significant biomass increase was observed at four plots.
- The study found a significant carbon accumulation rate of +0.24 MgC ha−1 y−1.
- Fast-growing species gained biomass significantly at only one plot.
- Slow-growing species increased significantly in biomass across half of the plots.
Takeaway
The study looked at many trees in tropical forests and found that some trees are getting bigger, but not all fast-growing trees are taking over; some slow-growing trees are doing well too.
Methodology
The study used standardized, repeated measurements of over 2 million trees in ten large forest plots across three continents.
Potential Biases
Potential biases may arise from the selection of plots and the historical disturbances that may not be fully accounted for.
Limitations
The study's findings may not apply universally to all tropical forests due to variations in local conditions and disturbances.
Participant Demographics
The study included diverse tropical forest plots from America, Africa, and Asia.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.24
Confidence Interval
[0.07, 0.39]
Statistical Significance
p<0.05
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website