Case management used to optimize cancer care pathways: A systematic review
2008

Case Management for Cancer Care: A Review

Sample size: 7 publication Evidence: low

Author Information

Author(s): Wulff Christian N, Thygesen Marianne, Søndergaard Jens, Vedsted Peter

Primary Institution: The Research Unit for General Practice in Aarhus, University of Aarhus

Hypothesis

Can case management improve cancer care pathways?

Conclusion

The study found no conclusive evidence on the effectiveness of case management in cancer patient care due to the limited number of studies and their methodological diversity.

Supporting Evidence

  • Only seven studies evaluating the effect of case management or similar interventions applied to cancer care were found.
  • The studies showed significant heterogeneity in target groups, intervention settings, and outcomes measured.
  • Some studies reported improvements in patient satisfaction and quality of life, but the methods of measurement varied widely.

Takeaway

This study looked at how case management might help cancer patients, but there weren't enough good studies to say if it really works.

Methodology

A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on case management interventions for cancer patients was conducted using multiple databases.

Potential Biases

The review may be subject to publication bias as it only included RCTs, potentially missing relevant studies.

Limitations

The review included only seven studies, which varied greatly in terms of target groups, interventions, and outcomes, making it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Participant Demographics

The studies included various cancer types, with some focusing on breast and lung cancer patients.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1472-6963-8-227

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication