Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Healthcare
Author Information
Author(s): Légaré France, Elwyn Glyn, Fishbein Martin, Frémont Pierre, Frosch Dominick, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Kenny David A, Labrecque Michel, Stacey Dawn, St-Jacques Sylvie, van der Weijden Trudy
Primary Institution: Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec
Hypothesis
How can shared decision-making (SDM) be effectively implemented in clinical practice?
Conclusion
The study aims to develop an international research team to enhance the implementation of shared decision-making in clinical practice.
Supporting Evidence
- Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial for patient-centered care.
- Patient decision aids improve patient engagement and satisfaction.
- Barriers to SDM include time constraints and misjudgment of patient preferences.
Takeaway
This study is about finding better ways for doctors and patients to make health decisions together.
Methodology
The study involves creating a collaborative research network, conducting workshops, and analyzing existing dyadic datasets.
Potential Biases
Health professionals may misjudge patients' desire for involvement in decision-making.
Limitations
The study may face challenges in reaching consensus on evaluation aspects and standardizing measures.
Participant Demographics
Researchers from Canada, US, UK, and Netherlands in fields like medicine, nursing, and psychology.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website