Scaling Behavior of Human Locomotor Activity Amplitude: Association with Bipolar Disorder Vulnerability Index of Bipolar Disorder
2011

Scaling Behavior of Human Locomotor Activity and Bipolar Disorder

Sample size: 101 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Premananda Indic, Salvatore Paola, Maggini Carlo, Ghidini Stefano, Ferraro Gabriella, Baldessarini Ross J., Murray Greg

Primary Institution: Department of Neurology, University of Massachusetts Medical School

Hypothesis

Multi-scale behavior in motility rhythms recorded over several days would distinguish between high and low vulnerability to bipolar disorder in healthy young adults, distinguish bipolar disorder patients from healthy controls, and distinguish among different psychopathological states of bipolar disorder patients.

Conclusion

The vulnerability index derived from motility data can effectively indicate the risk and presence of bipolar disorder.

Supporting Evidence

  • The vulnerability index was significantly associated with high risk for bipolar disorder.
  • BD patients had higher vulnerability index scores compared to healthy controls.
  • Multi-scale behavior in motility rhythms can indicate different psychopathological states in bipolar disorder patients.

Takeaway

This study looked at how people move and found that the way they move can help tell if they might have bipolar disorder.

Methodology

Data were collected using wrist-worn actigraphs in three studies involving healthy controls and bipolar disorder patients, analyzing multi-scale characteristics of daily motility rhythms.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from self-reported measures and the specific selection of participants.

Limitations

The study may not generalize to all populations, as it primarily involved specific age groups and clinical settings.

Participant Demographics

Participants included healthy young adults and bipolar disorder patients, with varying ages and sex distributions.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.004

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1371/journal.pone.0020650

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication