Coarse fishing and urothelial cancer: a regional case-control study
1990

Coarse Fishing and Urothelial Cancer

Sample size: 989 publication Evidence: high

Author Information

Author(s): T. Sorahan, G. Sole

Primary Institution: University of Birmingham

Hypothesis

Does the use of dyed maggots by anglers lead to an increased risk of developing urothelial cancers?

Conclusion

The study found no evidence that the use of dyed maggot bait by anglers increases the risk of urothelial cancer.

Supporting Evidence

  • The study included 989 patients with urothelial tumors and compared them to 2,059 electoral register controls.
  • Smoking was identified as a significant risk factor with a relative risk of 2.0.
  • Use of dyed maggots showed no significant difference in cancer risk compared to controls.

Takeaway

This study looked at whether fishing with dyed maggots causes cancer, and it found that it doesn't.

Methodology

A regional case-control study comparing histories from patients with urothelial cancer and matched controls.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from non-responders and the influence of previous studies on participant responses.

Limitations

The study excluded patients with Asian surnames and only included certain types of urothelial tumors.

Participant Demographics

Patients aged 15-74 years, primarily Caucasian, with a focus on men.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication