Understanding Cancer Risk and Distress in Women
Author Information
Author(s): Cull A, Fry A, Rush R, Steel C M
Primary Institution: Psychology Research Group, Imperial Cancer Research Fund (ICRF) Medical Oncology Unit, Western General Hospital
Hypothesis
Women attending a familial ovarian cancer clinic may have inaccurate perceptions of their cancer risk and varying levels of psychological distress.
Conclusion
Many women underestimated their ovarian cancer risk, and a significant portion experienced psychological distress.
Supporting Evidence
- 85% of women referred completed the questionnaire.
- 44% underestimated their ovarian cancer risk.
- 30% of the sample showed case-level psychological distress.
- Women with case-level distress were more likely to overestimate their risk.
Takeaway
This study found that many women think they are less likely to get ovarian cancer than they really are, and some feel very stressed about it.
Methodology
Women completed a questionnaire assessing their risk perceptions and psychological distress before attending the clinic.
Potential Biases
Potential biases in self-reported data on risk perception and distress.
Limitations
The study may not fully capture all factors influencing risk perception and distress.
Participant Demographics
Women referred to a familial ovarian cancer clinic, with varying family histories of cancer.
Statistical Information
P-Value
0.008
Statistical Significance
p=0.008
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website