A New Taxonomy for Perceptual Filling-In
Author Information
Author(s): Weil Rimona S., Rees Geraint
Primary Institution: Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London
Hypothesis
Whether different forms of perceptual filling-in share common mechanisms is not yet known.
Conclusion
The study presents a new framework for categorizing perceptual filling-in, highlighting the importance of boundaries in determining the latency of different forms of filling-in.
Supporting Evidence
- We propose a new taxonomy for perceptual filling-in.
- We review experimental evidence for different forms of filling-in.
- We show how this new framework sheds light on mechanisms for perceptual filling-in.
- We consider the importance of boundaries in perceptual filling-in.
Takeaway
Sometimes our brain fills in missing parts of what we see, like when we look at a picture with a hole in it and still see a complete image. This study helps us understand how and why that happens.
Methodology
The study reviews experimental evidence for different forms of perceptual filling-in and proposes a new taxonomy based on phenomenological and psychophysical characteristics.
Limitations
The review is not intended to be exhaustive but will provide examples for each type of perceptual filling-in.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website