Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research
2008
Bending Science: How Special Interests Corrupt Public Health Research
publication
Evidence: low
Author Information
Author(s): Thomas O. McGarity, Wendy E. Wagner
Conclusion
The manipulation of science by special interests can lead to serious health and environmental consequences.
Supporting Evidence
- The FDA's assessment of bisphenol A relied on studies funded by chemical manufacturers, ignoring independent research.
- Congress had to intervene to ban lead in children's toys after regulatory agencies failed to act despite evidence of harm.
- The book argues that manipulation of science can have serious consequences for health and the environment.
Takeaway
Some companies twist scientific studies to make their products seem safe, which can hurt people's health and the environment.
Potential Biases
The authors suggest that public health advocates also bend science, but provide few examples, which may mislead readers about the prevalence of this issue.
Limitations
The book relies heavily on secondary sources and presents a biased view by claiming everyone bends science without sufficient evidence.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website