Assessing Burn Wound Depth
Author Information
Author(s): Devgan Lara B, Bhat Satyanarayan PhD, Aylward S. B, Spence Robert J. MD, FACS
Primary Institution: The Johns Hopkins Burn Center/Michael D. Hendrix Burn Research Center, Baltimore, MD
Hypothesis
The study aims to review current research on modalities useful in the assessment of burn wound depth.
Conclusion
Laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and indocyanine green (ICG) video angiography provide the most accurate estimates for assessing burn wound depth.
Supporting Evidence
- Bedside evaluation is the most common method for assessing burn depth but is only accurate about two-thirds of the time.
- Thermography can achieve up to 90% accuracy in assessing burn depth.
- ICG video angiography and LDI are considered the best techniques for assessing burn depth.
Takeaway
Doctors need to know how deep a burn is to treat it properly, and some new tools can help them figure that out better.
Methodology
The study reviewed peer-reviewed articles from PubMed and Cochrane databases focusing on burn depth measurement techniques.
Potential Biases
Variability in clinician experience and subjective assessment can introduce bias.
Limitations
The accuracy of bedside clinical evaluation is suboptimal, and there is variability in assessments by different clinicians.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website