Using the ICF in Ireland
Author Information
Author(s): Good Anne, Carlo Francescutti, Andrea Simoncello, Luigi Tesio
Hypothesis
Has the ICF provided a useful framework and language for meeting the new data requirements?
Conclusion
The use of the ICF in Ireland's National Disability Survey has led to a broader understanding of disability and improved data collection.
Supporting Evidence
- The NDS identified a prevalence rate of 18.5% for disability compared to 8.1% reported by the Census.
- The NDS included a much larger range of people with disabilities than previous surveys.
- Environmental factors relevant to policy were comprehensively included in the NDS.
- The study highlighted the importance of ethical considerations in disability research.
Takeaway
This study looked at how a framework called ICF helped gather better information about people with disabilities in Ireland.
Methodology
Reflections based on the experience of the first National Disability Survey in Ireland, using the ICF as a framework.
Potential Biases
Previous negative experiences of research among people with disabilities may affect responses.
Limitations
Full evaluation of the NDS and its use of the ICF is still underway and not yet completed.
Participant Demographics
Participants included a broad range of individuals with disabilities across various demographics.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website