Measuring aortic distensibility with cmr using central pressures estimated in the magnet: comparison with carotid and peripheral pressures
2011

Measuring Aortic Distensibility with CMR

Sample size: 49 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Redheuil Alban, Bensalah Mourad, Kachenoura Nadjia, Bruguiere Eric, Azarine Arshid, Perdrix Ludivine, Bozec Erwan, Boutouyrie Pierre, DeCesare Alain, Mousseaux Elie

Primary Institution: University of Paris Descartes-European Hospital Georges Pompidou and INSERM U678, Paris, France

Hypothesis

Can central pressure measurement in the magnet improve the estimation of local aortic distensibility during CMR imaging?

Conclusion

Aortic distensibility can be accurately measured using central pressures in the magnet, showing strong correlations with traditional methods.

Supporting Evidence

  • Central pressures were estimated using both carotid tonometry and a brachial cuff during CMR imaging.
  • A strong linear relationship was found between aortic distensibility measured with carotid and Vicorder methods.
  • Distensibility values were lower when using peripheral brachial cuff pressures compared to central pressures.

Takeaway

Doctors can measure how stretchy the aorta is while taking pictures of the heart, which helps understand heart health better.

Methodology

The study involved 49 subjects, measuring aortic strain using CMR and estimating central pressures with both carotid tonometry and a brachial cuff.

Limitations

The study may not generalize to individuals with overt cardiovascular disease.

Participant Demographics

26 men and 23 women, average age 44±18 years, free from overt cardiovascular disease.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.001

Statistical Significance

p<0.001

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1532-429X-13-S1-P27

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication