Development of a practical tool to measure the impact of publications on the society based on focus group discussions with scientists
2011

Measuring the Societal Impact of Research Publications

Sample size: 24 publication Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Thomas E Dorner, Manfred Maier

Primary Institution: Medical University of Vienna

Hypothesis

How can the societal impact of research publications be practically assessed?

Conclusion

The developed tool provides valuable insights for assessing the societal impact of publications based on scientists' perceptions.

Supporting Evidence

  • The tool assesses societal impact through three dimensions: publication aim, authors' efforts, and translation accomplishment.
  • Focus group discussions revealed the need for a practical tool to measure societal impact.
  • External experts rated the tool's comprehensibility, relevance, and practicability as acceptable.

Takeaway

Scientists think we need a better way to measure how research helps society, and this study created a tool to do just that.

Methodology

Qualitative study using focus group discussions with biomedical scientists to develop and evaluate a tool for measuring societal impact.

Potential Biases

Potential bias from dominant voices in focus groups.

Limitations

The focus group method may not account for hierarchical influences, and the tool is not yet ready for routine implementation.

Participant Demographics

Biomedical scientists from the Medical University of Vienna.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/1471-2458-11-588

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication