Evaluating Microcirculation: Consensus from a Round Table Conference
Author Information
Author(s): De Backer Daniel, Hollenberg Steven, Boerma Christiaan, Goedhart Peter, Büchele Gustavo, Ospina-Tascon Gustavo, Dobbe Iwan, Ince Can
Primary Institution: Department of Intensive Care, Erasme University hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB)
Hypothesis
How can we standardize the evaluation of microcirculation in critically ill patients?
Conclusion
The study proposes a standardized scoring system for assessing microcirculation that includes vascular density, capillary perfusion, and a heterogeneity index.
Supporting Evidence
- Microvascular alterations are significant in critically ill patients, especially in sepsis.
- Recent technologies allow for direct visualization of microcirculation.
- Consensus on scoring systems can improve comparability of studies.
Takeaway
Doctors need a better way to check how well blood is flowing in tiny blood vessels, especially in very sick patients. This study suggests a simple scoring system to help with that.
Methodology
A round table conference was held to discuss image acquisition and scoring systems for microcirculation, leading to a consensus statement using the Delphi methodology.
Limitations
The study does not provide specific data on the effectiveness of the proposed scoring system in clinical practice.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website