Cardiopulmonary exercise response at high altitude in patients with congenital heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
2024

Exercise at High Altitude for Patients with Congenital Heart Disease

Sample size: 150 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Vecchiato Marco, Duregon Federica, Borasio Nicola, Faggian Sara, Bassanello Veronica, Aghi Andrea, Palermi Stefano, Degano Gino, Battista Francesca, Ermolao Andrea, Neunhaeuserer Daniel

Primary Institution: Department of Medicine DIMED, University of Padua, Padua, Italy

Hypothesis

How do patients with congenital heart disease respond to cardiopulmonary exercise at high altitude compared to healthy controls?

Conclusion

Short-term exposure to high altitude appears to be relatively well-tolerated by individuals with low-risk congenital heart disease, without a significantly different impact on cardiorespiratory response compared to healthy controls.

Supporting Evidence

  • Patients with congenital heart disease showed lower cardiorespiratory fitness at both low and high altitudes compared to controls.
  • Patients with congenital heart disease had a smaller decrease in peak workload and peak saturation when moving from low to high altitude.
  • None of the participants developed exercise-induced symptoms during the study.

Takeaway

Kids and adults with heart problems can exercise at high places for a short time without getting too sick, just like healthy kids.

Methodology

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cardiopulmonary exercise responses in patients with congenital heart disease and healthy controls at high and low altitudes.

Potential Biases

Moderate risk of bias in confounding, selection, and measurement domains.

Limitations

The review included a limited number of studies and patients, and there was a moderate risk of bias due to non-randomized samples.

Participant Demographics

150 participants, 74 with congenital heart disease and 76 healthy controls; 43% were women.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI: 2.33–18.88 for peak workload; 95% CI: 0.14–2.30 for peak saturation

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.3389/fcvm.2024.1454680

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication