Diagnosing the French Pox in Early Modern Augsburg
Author Information
Author(s): Claudia Stein
Primary Institution: Warwick University
Hypothesis
How did the early modern conception of physical signs influence the diagnosis and treatment of the French pox in Augsburg's hospital?
Conclusion
The study reveals that the diagnosis of the French pox was influenced by a flexible understanding of bodily signs and their relationship to disease.
Supporting Evidence
- Physical signs could indicate multiple diseases simultaneously.
- The diagnosis process involved both patients and practitioners sharing their knowledge.
- Hospital records show a flexible approach to disease classification.
- Different practitioners had varying responsibilities in the diagnosis process.
- Patients' personal narratives influenced their diagnosis.
- Medical practitioners relied on both visible signs and invisible interpretations.
- Historical accounts suggest a shared understanding of disease among all parties involved.
- Treatment methods were based on the perceived qualities of the disease and the patient's condition.
Takeaway
Doctors in the past looked at people's bodies differently than we do today, and they thought that signs of sickness could mean different things at the same time.
Methodology
The study reconstructs the diagnostic act using archival hospital records from the French-disease hospital in Augsburg.
Potential Biases
The interpretations of signs were influenced by the social status and experiences of both patients and practitioners.
Limitations
The study is based on a single case study, which may limit the generalizability of the findings.
Participant Demographics
The study includes patients from various social backgrounds seeking treatment for the French pox.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website