Comparing LDL Measurement Methods in Turkish Adults
Author Information
Author(s): Medine Alpdemir, Mehmet Fatih Alpdemir, Mehmet Şeneş
Primary Institution: University of Health Sciences, Ankara Training and Research Hospital
Hypothesis
How do the Friedewald, Martin/Hopkins, and Sampson formulas compare to direct LDL measurement in Turkish adults?
Conclusion
The Martin/Hopkins formula performed better than the Friedewald and Sampson formulas for estimating LDL-C in Turkish adults.
Supporting Evidence
- All three formulae showed a strong positive correlation with d-LDL-C.
- The Martin/Hopkins formula had a lower median difference compared to the others.
- The study included a large sample size of 6297 patients.
- Statistical analyses indicated significant differences in LDL-C estimations.
Takeaway
This study looked at different ways to measure cholesterol in people and found that one method is better than the others for Turkish adults.
Methodology
A retrospective study evaluated cholesterol panel results from 6297 patients aged 18-95 years over two years.
Potential Biases
Potential biases due to exclusion of certain patient demographics and reliance on laboratory data.
Limitations
The study used a direct LDL-C measurement method instead of the gold standard and lacked data on factors like race and obesity.
Participant Demographics
Patients aged 18-95 years, 58% female and 42% male.
Statistical Information
P-Value
p<0.001
Confidence Interval
95% CI=-1.01 to -0.93
Statistical Significance
p<0.001
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website