Setting Science Free
2006
The Need for Open Access in Scientific Publishing
Editorial
Author Information
Author(s): Stephen M. Milner
Hypothesis
The current system of scientific publishing is outdated and hinders the dissemination of knowledge.
Conclusion
The existing medical publishing system is slow, expensive, and limits access to scientific information.
Supporting Evidence
- 70% of the world cannot afford access to scientific journals.
- Some journal subscriptions can cost as much as $20,000 a year.
- Delays in publication can hinder scientific progress and innovation.
Takeaway
Scientists are giving away their work for free, but then have to pay a lot to read it. We need a better way to share science.
Potential Biases
The peer-review process may be influenced by space limitations and editorial directives rather than purely scientific merit.
Limitations
The current system has long delays in publication, high costs, and limited access to journals.
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website