Understanding Quality Work from General Practitioners' Perspective
Author Information
Author(s): Eva Lena Strandberg, Ingvar Ovhed, Anders Håkansson, Margareta Troein
Primary Institution: Blekinge R&D Unit, Lund University
Hypothesis
What does quality work mean from the perspective of general practitioners?
Conclusion
General practitioners see internal follow-up as a professional duty but view external control as an imposition, complicating systematic quality work.
Supporting Evidence
- Doctors expressed that quality work is often seen as a top-down imposition that infringes on their professional freedom.
- Many general practitioners prefer a bottom-up approach to quality work, viewing it as a natural part of their professional duty.
- Collegial discussions and audits are considered valuable for professional development and improving quality of care.
Takeaway
Doctors think it's important to check their own work, but they feel that outside rules make their job harder.
Methodology
Qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 14 general practitioners.
Potential Biases
Potential bias due to the authors' involvement in quality work and audit projects.
Limitations
Findings may not be generalizable beyond the specific context of Swedish primary care.
Participant Demographics
14 general practitioners, 7 men and 7 women, aged 35-64, with varying experiences of audit.
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Want to read the original?
Access the complete publication on the publisher's website