Perioperative outcomes in an age-adapted analysis of the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry for PDAC
2025

Impact of Age on Surgery Outcomes for Pancreatic Cancer

Sample size: 3011 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Tschaidse Tengis, Hofmann Felix O., Renz Bernhard, Hungbauer Maximilian, Klinger Carsten, Buhr Heinz J., Uhl Waldemar, Mees Sören Torge, Keck Tobias, Reissfelder Christoph, Ghadimi Michael, D’Haese Jan G., Werner Jens, Ilmer Matthias

Primary Institution: LMU University Hospital Munich

Hypothesis

How does age and tumor location affect postoperative morbidity and mortality in pancreatic cancer patients?

Conclusion

Older patients experience higher rates of major complications and mortality after pancreatic surgery, primarily due to increased failure to rescue rates.

Supporting Evidence

  • Major complications were more frequent in older patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
  • Mortality rates increased significantly with age, from 2.4% in early-onset to 6.6% in late-onset patients.
  • Failure to rescue rates were higher in older patients, indicating a greater risk of death after complications.

Takeaway

As people get older, they tend to have more problems after surgery for pancreatic cancer, but the surgery itself doesn't cause more specific issues like infections.

Methodology

Data from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry was analyzed for patients undergoing pancreatic surgery from 2014 to 2019, categorized by age and type of surgery.

Potential Biases

Potential biases may arise from the retrospective nature of the study and the reliance on registry data.

Limitations

The study is retrospective and primarily includes open surgeries, which may limit the applicability of results to minimally invasive techniques.

Participant Demographics

Patients were categorized into early-onset (<50 years), middle-onset (50-70 years), and late-onset (>70 years) pancreatic cancer.

Statistical Information

P-Value

p<0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI 0.65–0.94

Statistical Significance

p<0.01

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1186/s12893-024-02647-1

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication