Trends in Opioid Use Disorder in the Veterans Health Administration, 2005-2022
2024

Trends in Opioid Use Disorder in Veterans

Sample size: 5000000 publication 10 minutes Evidence: moderate

Author Information

Author(s): Gorfinkel Lauren R. MD MPH, Malte Carol A. MSW, Fink David S. PhD, Mannes Zachary L. PhD MPH, Wall Melanie M. PhD, Olfson Mark MD MPH, Livne Ofir MD MPH, Keyhani Salomeh MD, Keyes Katherine M. PhD, Martins Silvia S. MD PhD, Cerdá Magdalena DrPH, Gutkind Sarah MSPH, Maynard Charles C. PhD, Saxon Andrew J. MD, Simpson Tracy PhD, Gonsalves Gregg PhD, Lu Haidong PhD, McDowell Yoanna PhD, Hasin Deborah S. PhD

Primary Institution: Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Hypothesis

How did the prevalence of opioid use disorder (OUD) among patients in the Veterans Health Administration change from 2005 to 2022?

Conclusion

The prevalence of opioid use disorder among Veterans increased until 2017 and then declined by 2022.

Supporting Evidence

  • The prevalence of OUD increased from 0.60% in 2005 to 1.16% in 2017.
  • OUD diagnoses peaked in 2017 and declined to 0.97% by 2022.
  • Most patients diagnosed with OUD were men, with a significant increase in diagnoses among younger veterans.
  • Trends in OUD diagnoses varied by race and ethnicity, with declines observed among Hispanic and Black patients.

Takeaway

This study looked at how many veterans had problems with opioids over time and found that fewer veterans are having these problems now compared to a few years ago.

Methodology

This study used Veterans Health Administration data from 2005 to 2022 to analyze trends in opioid use disorder diagnoses.

Potential Biases

The sample may not be representative of all veterans or adults due to demographic differences.

Limitations

The study may have missed some cases of opioid use disorder due to reliance on diagnosis codes from administrative records.

Participant Demographics

The majority of participants were men, with varying percentages of different racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Statistical Information

P-Value

0.05

Confidence Interval

95% CI, 0.60%-0.61%

Statistical Significance

p<0.05

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51821

Want to read the original?

Access the complete publication on the publisher's website

View Original Publication